Candidates and the Economy – a Guide to the Maryland Primary

Peter Heck • June 7, 2022


When asked what issue concerns them most coming into this year’s midterm elections, most Americans, according to polls, cite the economy, especially inflation. A Gallup poll taken in May showed that 77% of respondents believe the national economy is getting worse, with 85% rating giving it a rating of “fair” or “poor.” Inflation is expected to be the deciding issue for many voters in this November's elections.

 

With that in mind, Common Sense for the Eastern Shore is reporting the statements of the candidates for governor and lieutenant governor of Maryland, and for representative for the First Congressional District, which includes all of the Eastern Shore. Taken from the candidates’ websites, here are excerpts outlining their positions on the state’s economy. Links to the websites are provided for readers who want to explore the candidates’ full statements.

 

All but one of the Republican candidates for governor make tax cuts the key — often the only — element of their economic policies. By contrast, most of the Democrats offer detailed road maps to improve the economy of the state and the economic status of its residents.

 

The primary election is scheduled for Tuesday, July 19. Only residents who have registered their political party preference are eligible to vote, and they may only vote for their party’s candidates. Thus Democrats may only vote for Democratic candidates, and Republicans only for Republican candidates.

       

Governor and Lt. Governor

 

There are four choices on the Republican ballot for governor and lieutenant governor.

 

Dan Cox + Gordana Schifanelli — Republican

www.dancoxforgovernor.com

“Reduce taxes for families, businesses, and retirees through economic ingenuity to awaken a     new era of economic prosperity for Maryland.”

 

Robin Ficker + LeRoy F. Yegge, Jr. — Republican

www.cutmdsalestax2cents.com

“A two-cent cut in the Maryland sales tax will give every Marylander a tax cut every day and give Maryland a much needed ‘business-friendly,’ label. Marylanders will save hundred$/year, or together more than $1.7 billion annually.” Ficker promises to work to attract major employers, such as Apple, Amazon, and Facebook, to the state to create new jobs.

 

Kelly Schulz + Jeff Woolford — Republican

www.kellyschulzforgovernor.com

“I will fight every effort by the legislature to raise taxes — and I will use my platform and position to fight for tax cuts every single year that I am in office.” “One of my top priorities as governor will be to cut taxes for all Marylanders, which begins with fighting to give our retirees the relief they deserve.”

 

Joe Werner + Minh Thanh Luong — Republican

www.wernerformaryland.com

“I envision the growth of small businesses and educational systems, creating policies centered on economic opportunity and our community safety.”

 

There are 10 choices on the Democratic ballot for governor and lieutenant governor. 

 

Rushern Baker III + Nancy Navarro — Democrat

www.rushernbaker.com

“Recovery is an opportunity to create a state where everyone can benefit from a thriving and competitive economy. We want to deliberately invest in the people and infrastructure of underserved communities, eliminate discriminatory practices in lending, ensure equal access to grants, and make Maryland the Black business startup capital of the nation.”

 

Jon Baron + Natalie Williams — Democrat

www.jonbaron.com

“As governor, I would –

Help unemployed workers get back on their feet:

  • Providing immediate job-search and other reemployment services when Marylanders file for unemployment.
  • Offering a sizable earnings supplement to long-term unemployed workers who find a full-time job.
  • Address the longstanding problems of stagnant wages and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Marylanders by:
  • Providing high-quality job training to every young adult who wants to advance.
  • Supporting English language learners entering the workforce.
  • My approach to job opportunity (and other challenges) is fiscally responsible in a way that should resonate with Maryland’s business community. Expansion of proven-effective programs  can be accomplished, in most cases, using existing state funds. Our next governor needs to chart a course that ensures all Marylanders share in the recovery.”

 

Peter Franchot + Monique Anderson-Walker — Democrat

www.franchot.com

“The Franchot administration will create 100,000 family-supporting jobs in 100 weeks through   

  • targeted investment in productive infrastructure projects;
  • the creation of a statewide jobs-training program in partnership with the private sector and unions;
  • the dramatic improvement of the operating environment for small businesses via more efficient government services, streamlined and coordinated regulation, and better access to capital.

The Franchot administration will pair a bold expansion of Maryland’s public works with a commitment to robust project labor agreements and community benefits agreements and negotiations with the private sector on every project. A special emphasis in these agreements  will be placed on apprenticeship training and local hiring.


In addition to targeted and stimulative investment in infrastructure, the Franchot administration will champion the interests of the state’s small businesses that are the backbone of the state’s economy. To that end, a Franchot administration will review all government regulatory processes and fees that impact small businesses to ensure that bureaucratic red tape and associated costs are not disproportionately or unnecessarily impacting small businesses.”

 

Douglas F. Gansler + Candace Hollingsworth — Democrat

www.ganslerformaryland.com

  • Raise the minimum wage.
  • Hire minority-owned businesses as sub-contractors and prime contractors alike.
  • Ease access to capital for Black-owned businesses.
  • Ensure Black-owned cannabis and sports betting companies have a fair shot to succeed.
  • Prioritize returning citizens’ employment opportunities.
  • Meaningfully diversify state government at every level.
  • Laser-focus on helping Baltimore realize its unlimited promise.

 

Ralph W. Jaffe + Mark Greben — Democrat

www.fedupwithcrookedpolitics.com

“The Jaffe movement’s mission is to put a stop to corruption in the Maryland political system and to replace it with true, ethical reform.

  • No tax increases: Will oppose any attempts by the General Assembly to increase taxes.
  • Will attempt to stop Baltimore Gas and Electric from ripping off its customers. BGE needs to be more sensitive to the needs of its customers rather than the needs of its stockholders.”

 

Ashwani Jain + LaTrece Hawkins Lytes — Democrat

www.jainforgovernor.com

  • Eliminate the state income tax for 95% of workers.
  • Guarantee free public transit.
  • Create the first statewide guaranteed jobs programs.

 

John King + Michelle Daugherty Siri — Democrat

www.johnkingforGovernor.com

“A King-Siri administration will focus efforts around five key planks:

Ensuring everyone has access to the building blocks of economic opportunity.

  1. Ensuring everyone has access to the building blocks of economic opportunity.
  2. Building strong pathways so that people have the skills and opportunities required for the jobs they want.
  3. Supporting good jobs in healthy businesses.
  4. Building vibrant communities statewide.
  5. Advancing equity and making sure our economy works for every Marylander by directly tackling systemic disparities.”

 

Wes Moore + Aruna Miller — Democrat

www.wesmoore.com

  • Build the workforce of the future by transforming Maryland’s workforce development system.
  • Drive innovation and technology advancements by producing 150,000 new STEM graduates.
  • Grow new industries and businesses by leveraging relationships with Maryland’s federal agencies, military installations, and colleges and universities.
  • Attract and retain talent by creating a talent-recruitment function in the Department of Commerce and by implementing incentives for remote workers to move to Maryland.
  • Support small and micro businesses by modernizing the regulatory process and making it easier for Maryland businesses to compete and win.
  • Support working families by raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2023, implementing a comprehensive paid family and medical leave program in Maryland, and leveraging new federal transportation funds to connect people with new opportunities.”

 

Tom Perez + Shannon Sneed — Democrat

www.tomperez.com

“Tom believes that our children deserve a better future than we have today. And as a civil rights attorney, lifelong ally of the labor movement, and career champion of working families, Tom knows the best way to secure that bright future is to do the work to set up a true win-win: creating good, secure jobs in our communities so the economy thrives, and ensuring that Marylanders have the in-demand skills they need to thrive in those jobs. As governor, he will stand up for Maryland’s working families by fighting for things such as income equality, affordable childcare, collective bargaining, pensions, paid family leave, a more progressive tax system, fair wages, unemployment insurance that functions, and real investments in workforce development so everyone in this state can win.”

 

Jerome M. Segal + Justinian M. Dispenza — Democrat

www.segalforgovernor.org

  • Guaranteed basic employment: A legal guarantee of at least 32 hours/week of paid employment.
  • Transition to the four-day work week via a time-liberty law allowing workers to opt for four days after three years on the job.
  • Building the simpler living option by living wage policies to reduce the cost of meeting core economic needs, thus making the four-day work week viable for all.
  • This living wage policy matrix includes a right to a one-time, zero-interest mortgage for modest or tiny new homes, and free education pre-K through college, reducing automobile dependency by free public transit, and the “near-free EV” as well as highly subsidized alternatives to the car.
  • Tax transformation that includes tax-elimination for the bottom third of households and more progressive taxation among the top one-third, including progressive property taxes.

 

Congress 1st District

 

Andrew P. Harris — Republican – incumbent

www.andyharris.com

Rep. Harris is unopposed in the Republican primary election. His website does not address the economic issues facing the state.

 

There are two Democratic choices on the ballot for 1st District representative.

 

R. David Harden — Democrat

www.hardenforcongress.com

  • Jobs: “I support the American Jobs Plan to create economic opportunities for all Marylanders. The district has incredible opportunities with agriculture, tourism, and a Chesapeake Bay economy, but this also means creating the jobs that prepare our district for a new energy and  climate future. In the coming decade, this district can also build a more innovative economy focused on health-care service and delivery, biotechnology to improve people's lives, and advanced defense technologies to safeguard the homeland.”       
  • Small businesses: “As we move into a post-covid economy, I will introduce a regulatory approach to prioritize the resiliency of our local businesses. Equally important, our small businesses can use a hand to leverage capital, technology, and expertise to connect to the highest markets in the world today.”
  • A living wage: “$15 minimum wage is the essential starting line to secure that all Americans can put food on the table day in and day out. I support the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.”

       

Heather R. Mizeur — Democrat

www.heathermizeur.com

“My top priority as your congresswoman will always be the economy first.

Here is my plan:

  • Reining in inflation and lowering costs: Address the inflation that is raising everyday costs for working families.
  • Tax relief for small businesses and support for the middle class: Reduce economic and regulatory pressures on small businesses. Recognize that a strong middle class fuels growth.
  • Make more on the Shore — Manufacturing and construction: Create conditions for more manufacturing and construction jobs in our communities.
  • 21st Century skills — Workforce training and education: Teach job skills that will match the needs of employers.
  • Housing and community development: Provide access to quality and affordable housing in safe and healthy communities as the foundation for all other economic and social activities.
  • Infrastructure: Seize historic investment opportunities for broadband, ports, roads, bridges, freight rail, public transit, airports, wastewater, and utilities.
  • Agriculture and forestry: Partner with ag innovators to increase market opportunities for next-level local foods, products, services, and curated experiences.
  • Commercial fishing and aquaculture: Strengthen commercial fishing and aquaculture to help each grow and thrive for generations to come.
  • Arts and culture: Recognize the role arts and humanities can play as a catalyst for tourism, jobs, and regional economic growth.
  • Defense and cybersecurity: Provide support for growing defense technologies and create new defense and cybersecurity jobs in the First District.”

 

 

Peter Heck is a Chestertown-based writer and editor, who spent 10 years at the Kent County News and three more with the Chestertown Spy. He is the author of 10 novels and co-author of four plays, a book reviewer for Asimov’s and Kirkus Reviews, and an incorrigible guitarist.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Eastern Neck Board of Directors April 16, 2025
Let your elected representatives and business and cultural leaders know that our Refuge and others like it all over the country deserve to be protected. They deserve our stewardship for the natural wonders they shelter, and because they provide refuge for people, too.
By Elaine McNeil April 9, 2025
The Budget Deficit In a recent debate on closing Maryland’s budget deficit, Minority Leader Jason Buckel, a Republican delegate from Allegany County, made an important point: “The man upstairs has only been there for two, three years. I don’t blame him for our economic failures of the last 10,” referring to Democratic Gov. Wes Moore, who was elected in 2022. Ahead of the 2026 gubernatorial elections, Buckel’s comments highlight a key reality that many of his Republican colleagues seldom admit: It isn’t right to blame Gov. Moore for a budget deficit that has been brewing for years. Now projected at $3.3 billion, Maryland’s structural deficit is a problem that started long before Moore took office. In fact, it was first projected in 2017, during the tenure of former GOP Gov. Larry Hogan. This isn’t an opinion — it’s a fact that Buckel and other lawmakers, including Republican Del. Jefferson Ghrist, have bravely acknowledged. During that same debate, Ghrist remarked that the Department of Legislative Services had warned about this deficit throughout Hogan’s administration, yet he did little to address it. Ghrist pointed out that during Maryland’s “good years,” when the state received a flood of federal covid-19 relief dollars, spending spiraled without regard for long-term fiscal health. Hogan used these one-time federal funds to support ongoing programs, which masked the true state of Maryland’s finances and created an illusion of fiscal stability. Hogan continues to take credit for the “surplus” Maryland had in 2022 — even though experts repeatedly note it was caused by the influx of federal dollars during the pandemic. As Ghrist correctly observed, the lack of fiscal restraint and slow growth during the Hogan years laid the groundwork for the $3.3 billion structural deficit the state faces today. Indeed, Maryland’s economy has been stagnant since 2017, especially in comparison to its neighboring states, well before Moore took office. Compounding these challenges are President Donald Trump’s reckless layoffs and trade wars with our allies. Thousands of federal workers who live in Maryland are losing their jobs, which will cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue. Trump’s tariffs will also put an enormous strain on local businesses, including Eastern Shore farmers, who are now subject to up to 15% retaliatory tariffs on chicken, wheat, soybeans, corn, fruits, and vegetables. FY2026 Budget Considering this grim reality, Maryland’s lawmakers are making difficult, but necessary, decisions to shore up the state’s finances. Gov. Moore and state legislative leaders recently agreed to a budget that prioritizes expanding Maryland’s economy without raising taxes on most residents. In fact, 94% of Marylanders should see either a tax cut or no change at all to their income tax bill under the proposed agreement. Lawmakers also plan to cut government spending by the largest amount in 16 years, while at the same time making targeted investments in emerging industries, such as quantum computing and aerospace defense, so the state is less dependent on federal jobs. While the richest Marylanders might see their income taxes go up, it’s reasonable to ask someone making over $750,000 a year to pay $1,800 more to support law enforcement, strengthen our schools, and grow our economy. As for the proposed tax on data and IT services, these products aren’t subject to Maryland’s sales tax under current law. Maryland leaders want to modernize our tax code by levying a 3% sales tax on these products. Because they don’t raise income taxes on the majority of Marylanders and because state leaders are also cutting spending by billions, these ideas are fair. They’re also necessary after Gov. Hogan chose to kick the can down the road instead of addressing Maryland’s long-predicted deficit and now that Trump’s policies will lay off thousands of Marylanders and his tariffs will hurt our state. By making responsible choices now, Maryland leaders are putting the state on a path to long-term economic stability. Their decisions will help Maryland thrive, create jobs, and invest in the vital services that every resident relies on — without burdening hardworking families. I’m confident Maryland will emerge stronger, more resilient, and ready to lead in the industries of tomorrow. Elaine McNeil is chair of the Queen Anne’s Democratic Central Committee.
By John Christie April 2, 2025
Among Donald Trump’s most recent targets is what he calls “rogue law firms.” At 6pm last Thursday, March 27, he issued an Executive Order (EO) aimed at my old law firm, WilmerHale, as one of those “rogue” firms. Approximately 15 hours later, the firm filed a 63-page complaint challenging the EO on multiple constitutional grounds. The EO is an “unprecedented assault on the bedrock principle that one should not be penalized for merely defending or prosecuting a lawsuit” and constitutes an “undisguised form of retaliation for representing clients and causes Trump disfavors.” And by 8pm on Friday, March 28, a little over 24 hours after the EO was first issued, a federal district court judge in Washington granted a request for a temporary restraining order, blocking key provisions of the EO from taking effect for now. In doing so, the Court found that “the retaliatory nature of the EO is clear from its face. There is no doubt that it chills speech and legal advocacy and qualifies as a constitutional harm.” The Executive Order The EO and a so-called “Fact Sheet” that went with it recites that the Administration is committed to addressing the significant risks associated with law firms, particularly so-called “Big Law” firms that engage in conduct detrimental to critical American interests. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (WilmerHale) is yet another law firm said to have abandoned the legal profession’s highest ideals and abused its pro bono practice by engaging in activities that “undermine justice and the interests of the United States.” The specific examples offered in support of this conclusion: The EO asserts that WilmerHale “engages in obvious partisan representations to achieve political ends,” an apparent reference to the firm’s representation of Trump’s political opponents — namely the Democratic National Committee and the presidential campaigns of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The EO cites WilmerHale’s “egregious conduct” in “supporting efforts to discriminate on the basis of race,” an apparent reference to the firm’s representation of Harvard in the Students for Fair Admissions litigation. The EO accuses WilmerHale of “backing the obstruction of efforts to prevent illegal aliens from committing horrific crimes,” an apparent reference to the firm’s litigation related pro bono practice and successful challenges to immigration related policies. The EO accuses WilmerHale of “furthering the degradation of the quality of American elections,” an apparent reference to the film’s involvement in challenges to restrictive state voter-identification and voter-registration laws. The EO singles out certain current and former WilmerHale partners, including Robert Mueller, for special criticism by describing Mr. Mueller’s investigation as “one of the most partisan investigations in American history” and having “weaponized the prosecutorial power to suspend the democratic process and distort justice.” The EO then Revokes security clearances held by WilmerHale attorneys; Prohibits the federal government from hiring WilmerHale employees absent a special waiver; Orders a review and the possible termination of federal contracts with entities that do business with the firm; Calls for the withdrawal of government goods or services from the firm; and Calls for restrictions on the ability of WilmerHale employees to enter federal buildings (presumably including federal courthouses) and on their “engaging” with government employees. WilmerHale’s Complaint WilmerHale engaged Paul Clement, a former Solicitor General during the George W. Bush administration and a well-known advocate frequently representing conservative causes, to represent the firm in this matter. Assisted by some 15 WilmerHale litigators, the complaint names the Executive Office of the President and 48 other Departments, Commissions, and individual Officers in their official capacity as defendants. A variety of constitutional violations are alleged: The First Amendment protects the rights of WilmerHale and its clients to speak freely, and petition the courts and other government institutions without facing retaliation and discrimination by federal officials. The separation of powers limits the President’s role to enforcing the law and no statute or constitutional provision empowers him to unilaterally sanction WilmerHale in this manner. The EO flagrantly violates due process by imposing severe consequences without notice or an opportunity to be heard. The EO violates the right to counsel protected by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and imposes unconstitutional conditions on federal contracts and expenditures. The complaint alleges that WilmerHale has already suffered irreparable damage in the 16 hours since the EO issued. The firm has been vilified by the most powerful person in the country as a “rogue law firm” that has “engaged in conduct detrimental to critical American interests. The EO will inevitable cause extensive, lasting damage to WilmerHale’s current and future business prospects. The harm to the firm’s reputation will negatively affect its ability to recruit and retain employees. Further Proceedings Temporary restraining orders constitute emergency relief upon a showing of likely success on the merits and irreparable harm were the temporary relief not entered. A later hearing will be held in order for the judge to determine whether a preliminary injunction should be issued preventing the government from executing the EO during the continued length of the litigation. Editorial Note: In light of the recent capitulation of several “Big Law” firms to the unreasonable and unconstitutional attacks by the Trump administration, WilmerHale is providing a blueprint for resistance as it fights back. More law firms need to be inspired by WilmerHale’s response to Trump’s demand for revenge on his so-called political enemies. John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Bill Flook & CSES Staff April 2, 2025
Tom Timberman was one of the founders of Common Sense for the Eastern Shore. Sadly, he died last month. He will be missed. Common Sense exists because of his leadership and inspiration. His vision was to provide factual and timely commentary and analysis on topics that concern people who live and work on Maryland's Eastern Shore, and to provide factual reporting to help readers shape their own lives. It was important to Tom, as it is today to the editorial board, for Common Sense to help voters to be aware of the effects — personal and local — of decisions made at the federal and state levels. Especially relevant now is this from our Mission Statement: “We seek an America responsive to its citizens and its constitution.” We reprint this tribute from Bill Flook, President of the Democratic Club of Kent County : Many of us were deeply saddened to learn of TomTimberman’s passing last week. It’s hard to believe that such a strong Democratic voice is gone. I worked with Tom for much of the past decade on many good projects promoting our values and activities, including helping on his campaign for County Commissioner, and I’ll particularly miss following his lead as Captain of the Dawn Patrol. Our group met most Saturday mornings for coffee and some good chat, before heading up to Dems HQ to set up the booth there. We’ll miss you, Tom!
By Jared Schablein April 2, 2025
After over 12 hours of debate over two days (and a whole circus from the other side), the Maryland House of Delegates has passed HB 350, this year's state budget, and sent it to the State Senate. This budget is a deal between House Democrats, Senate Democrats, and Governor Wes Moore. It faces our state's $3 billion deficit head-on not with fantasy math, but with real choices: smart cuts and fair new revenue. This is what grown-up governing looks like. How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. Leaders began warning about a shortfall in 2017 when Governor Larry Hogan was in office. Hogan made our state budget bigger every year, but the legislature wasn’t allowed to move money around or make common-sense changes. By law, they could only make cuts. In 2020, Maryland voters changed that. Starting in 2023, lawmakers finally got full power to shape the budget, not just cut from it. Instead of fixing the problem, Governor Hogan used federal COVID relief to hide our fiscal instability. Then, before leaving office, he drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image. Today, we are facing a new fiscal arsonist. Donald Trump’s trade wars and cuts to federal programs hit Maryland hard. We have more federal jobs and agencies than any other state, so we felt it worse than most. A University of Maryland study says Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion. Trump/Musk's policies caused over 30,000 people in Maryland to lose their jobs, offices to shut down, and promised investments to disappear. These federal cuts added another $300 million to our budget deficit. COVID relief gave us a short break and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone now. Meanwhile, housing, healthcare, and college prices have gone way up. The Trump–Musk White House is making it worse by cutting even more funding, eliminating research, and gutting the services we rely on. That’s why Maryland had to act. We needed a real plan to protect working people, fund our schools and hospitals, and keep our state strong. Why Cuts Were Needed Trump’s trade wars and cuts to federal agencies hit Maryland harder than any other state. A University of Maryland study says those tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion. That hurts real people: A chicken farmer on the Eastern Shore is paying 25% more for fertilizer. A dock worker in Baltimore has fewer ships to unload. A restaurant owner in Western Maryland can’t afford eggs and tomatoes. We’ve lost over 30,000 jobs. Offices have shut down. Promised investments disappeared. The decisions of the Trump/Musk administration added $300 million to our state deficit.
No mandate. Image: CSES design.
By Jan Plotczyk November 19, 2024
 The 2024 presidential election was over swiftly. The Associated Press called it at 5:34 am on Nov. 6, and by 8 am, President-elect Donald Trump was crowing about the “ historic mandate ” given to him by the American people. A “mandate”? Turns out not. Trump jumped to an early lead on election night, but in the following days, his lead diminished as mail-in and provisional ballots were counted. A Baltimore Banner article on Nov. 6 highlighted the “Trump shift” that had occurred in every political subdivision in Maryland, even in counties where Democrat Kamala Harris won. This shift described the increase in Trump support since his loss to President Joe Biden in 2020 . As of Nov. 6, the biggest Trump shift was an 8.1% increase in his support in red Cecil County, but there were also shifts in the central Maryland counties that are the state’s Democratic strongholds — 4.3% in Montgomery and lesser amounts in other blue counties. Fourteen counties recorded shifts of 4% or more. On the Eastern Shore, every county had a shift over 4.5% except Talbot (2.7%), and the five largest shifts were Shore counties. For the state’s Democrats, it did not look encouraging. But as mail-in and provisional ballots were counted across the state, the Trump shift was reduced everywhere, and as of Nov. 16, disappeared altogether in Garrett (-1.2%) and Charles (-0.1%) counties. The shift dropped below 3% in all Maryland counties. Cecil’s shift became 2.1%. Montgomery’s shift dropped to 2.9%. Talbot’s shift declined to 0.2%, lowest of the Eastern Shore counties. Now, instead of five, only two of the highest five shifts were in Eastern Shore counties. The red bars in the chart below represent the Trump shift percentage values as of Nov. 16, in ascending order. The grey bars represent the misleading (and ephemeral) Trump shift percentage values as of Nov. 6. Please note the degree to which the Trump shift lessened and disappeared in the 10 days after the election. Another red mirage. But if you had only read the Nov. 6 article and not looked at the updated data, you would have been fooled into thinking Trump support is stronger than it is.
Show More