Local Lawyer Faced with Pivotal Impeachment Vote

Kevin Hemstock • March 2, 2021

(The Second of Two Parts. Read Part 1 here.)

The second week of March 1868, following George Vickers’s election to the U.S. Senate, was very cold. In fact, the Chester River was still frozen. As a consequence, the ice-breaker Chesapeake was sent over to Chestertown from Baltimore, with the committee to inform Vickers of his election, and to transport him first to Annapolis and thence to Washington. Vickers didn’t know they were coming and was no doubt surprised when the committee showed up on the morning of Saturday, March 7, at his Mill Street manse.

Haste was needed — Congress was in session and there were serious matters under way. Only the week before, the Republican-dominated House of Representatives had voted to impeach President Andrew Johnson, the Democratic southerner who had taken over the nation’s top post upon the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. It was the first time in the history of the nation that a president had been impeached.

The articles of impeachment had been sent over to the Senate — where Vickers had just won a seat — and that august body would act as a jury to decide whether the president would be removed from office. In fact, the impeachment trial had already begun.

There were eleven articles of impeachment.


Primarily, President Johnson was accused of violating the Tenure of Office Act, passed on March 2, 1867 over his veto, by replacing Secretary of War Edward M. Stanton with Lorenzo Thomas. There was more to it than that, of course — but the Stanton issue seemed clear-cut to the Republicans. The core fact operating against Johnson was that he was not well liked in D.C., particularly among those who came from northern states, and many thought he was too lenient in his Reconstruction policies in the South.

 

The 17th president, Johnson was born Dec. 29, 1808 in North Carolina. He moved early on to Tennessee where his first occupation was as a tailor. He was unschooled, but inquisitive and focused. After his wife, the former Miss Eliza McCardle, taught him math and helped him improve his writing skills, he became a voracious reader and began a busy political career. He was elected to Congress in 1843, became the governor of Tennessee in 1853, and was elected by that state’s legislature to the U.S. Senate in 1857. During the war, he was the Union military governor of Tennessee, holding that post until his selection by Lincoln, in 1864, as vice president.

 

His storied political career notwithstanding, he was not well received when he arrived in Washington, where he was considered an outsider, particularly after his vice-presidential inauguration speech, given with a very noticeable drunken slur. Also, he was a political wild card — his positions difficult to predict. After rising to the presidency, his post-war stance on Reconstruction was controversial — he was too conciliatory to the South and his support for a general amnesty for Confederates put him on the wrong side of the Congressional majority.




Pushing for the impeachment with all his heart and influence was Pennsylvania Congressman Thaddeus Stevens who became one of the House impeachment managers. This ardent abolitionist wanted the South to pay dearly for its transgression of secession and its immoral support and perpetuation of slavery. One of the leaders of the Radical Republican element of the Republican Party, Stevens was the author of the 11th article of impeachment, which his supporters felt would most likely be successful in the president’s removal.

 

In arguing for conviction, Stevens, in preparation for his April 27, 1868 speech before the U.S. Senate, said it didn’t matter whether the president violated the law, if he violated his oath of office.

 

Not everyone wanted Johnson removed, even among Republicans. If he were found guilty, lame-duck Sen. Benjamin Wade, president pro tempore of the Senate, would become president, since Johnson didn’t have a vice president. Wade had some controversial beliefs, generally panned by D.C. politicians, including the notion, thought to be ridiculous at the time, that women should be allowed to vote.

 

The trial took two months to consider three of the 11 articles of impeachment. Supreme Court Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase presided. On May 16, 1868 after various amendments, the vote was taken only on the 11th article of impeachment. Vickers, in his written opinion, gave it a thumbs-down, calling on his legal expertise in review and countering Stevens:

 

“The eleventh article is anomalous, indefinite, and liable to the objection of multiplicity. If it were possible to put it in the form of an indictment or of a declaration in a civil action, it would be quashed on motion by a court of law.”

 

The vote was 35-19, one vote shy of the two-thirds majority to convict. Ten days later, the Senate took up the impeachment again. The second article of impeachment resulted in the same vote. As did the vote on the third article. Vickers, by virtue of this alphabetical call of the question, was the last one to vote in the acquit column.

 

After that, the majority Republicans gave up and declined to prosecute the other eight articles because they didn’t wish to give the “anti-impeachers” and the president the satisfaction of an acquittal, according to the New York Herald.

 

In effect, the humble lawyer from the pastoral county of Kent, on Maryland’s idyllic Eastern Shore, saved the Johnson presidency.

 

His constituents were thrilled as demonstrated by the Kent News, May 30, 1868:

 

“The people of the whole country, and especially those of the border States, have great cause to be thankful that this trial, so-called, has resulted in the acquittal of the President. A different result would doubtless have been followed by measures ever more revolutionary than any which have marked the radical policy in the past. Under the plea of possessing an anti-republican form of government, our own State, in all probability, would have been placed under military rule, the officers chosen by the people displaced, and a complete dictatorship established over us. …”

 

Johnson, though saved from removal, failed to win the Democratic nomination for a second term as president, wearing the stain of impeachment forever more. New York governor Horatio Seymore was chosen as the candidate from that party to oppose Republican Gen. Ulysses S. Grant who was elected president in November 1868.

 

Johnson continued in politics, and before his death on July 31, 1875, served a term as senator from Tennessee.

 

Vickers finished out his single term as senator and then returned to his law practice in Chestertown. He died of heart disease at his home in Chestertown, Oct. 8. 1879. His remains were interred at Chester Cemetery next to his son Benjamin C. Vickers, who had died in 1862 from wounds sustained the Battle of Shiloh in which he had fought for the Confederacy.

 

 

Kevin Hemstock writes from Millington. The former editor of the Kent County News, his book, Injustice on the Eastern Shore, was published in 2015. He has also self-published a number of books on the topic of local history.

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By CSES Staff September 17, 2025
Easton pastor Daniel Omar Fuentes Espinal, who was detained by federal immigration officials earlier this summer and later released, now has a court date set before a federal immigration judge, according to newly filed records. Fuentes Espinal, 54, has led Iglesia del Nazareno Jesus Te Ama since 2015 and is widely regarded by neighbors and local officials as a respected community leader. In July, he was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which alleged he overstayed his visa by 25 years after arriving from Honduras. The arrest drew swift reaction from across Maryland. Lawmakers and community members questioned why Fuentes Espinal was detained, noting he had no criminal record. Rep. Glenn Ivey and Sen. Sarah Elfreth reported at the time that his family had not seen him since the arrest, had only limited contact, and feared he would be deported. After weeks of uncertainty, Fuentes Espinal was released on August 15 and reunited with his family. “My family and I are very thankful for all of you,” he said. “I’m very happy to be home with my family and my community. I want to say thank you, thank you, thank you, and God bless everyone.” Friends of the family say he is now working toward legal citizenship, but his case remains unresolved. Federal court records show his first hearing is scheduled for March 31, 2026, in Baltimore. The proceeding, known as a master calendar hearing, marks the initial stage in removal cases. Immigration judges use the session to explain rights and responsibilities to those appearing before the court. According to ICE, if Fuentes Espinal fails to appear, he could be ordered to leave the country. For now, the pastor continues his ministry in Easton, awaiting what is likely to be a lengthy legal process.
By Jan Plotczyk September 17, 2025
On Sept. 11, a group of ultraright House Republicans delivered a letter to House leadership demanding the formation of a select committee on “the money, influence, and power behind the radical left’s assault on America and the rule of law.” Twenty-three reactionary members of Congress signed the letter, including some of the most extreme right-wingers in the House of Representatives. Among the signers is our own First District congressman, Andrew P. Harris, who’s added his voice to the cacophony demanding that something be done about the so-called left-wing threat to America. The letter was composed quickly after last week’s sniper murder of Charlie Kirk, a right-wing podcaster and campus provocateur. It presents a rationalization for investigating the finances of left-wing organizations and persons by blaming them not only for Kirk’s violent death, but for all manner of other problems ills in the country today: Many attacks on “our way of life” Sustained breakdown of law and order Open borders that allow “illegal aliens” to victimize law-abiding Americans Murders of innocent Americans, prominent and unknown alike Assassination attempts of GOP politicians The solution proposed in the letter is to “follow the money” by investigating such persons and groups as George Soros, the Wren Collective, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the U.N., and radicals and organizations suspected of financing the concerted effort to destroy MAGA America. They want to trace the money that, they claim without evidence, funds “the NGOs, donors, media, public officials, and all entities driving this coordinated attack.” But moderate observers and commentators see a broader aim — the end of free speech when the speaker disagrees with the views of the current ruling party. As expressed by Democracy Docket , a digital news platform, “The Trump administration’s rhetoric around Kirk’s murder and its attempt to link it to progressive causes and groups has raised fears it seeks to use the killing as false justification to further crack down on political speech and opposition politics in the U.S.” Harris and the other letter signers have joined a loud and strident chorus of alt-right voices demanding “justice” by dismantling the liberal and left organizations that they claim are fomenting violence. Also on Sept. 11, President Trump told reporters , "We have radical left lunatics out there and we just have to beat the hell out of them." On Sept. 15, Vice President Vance called for the mass doxing of anyone celebrating Kirk’s murder. “Call them out. Hell, call their employer.” A growing number of companies are terminating and suspending employees for posting messages critical of Charlie Kirk on social media. Stephen Miller , Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, referred to the Democratic Party as “a vast domestic terror movement” responsible for Kirk’s murder. He said the administration would target those who are “paying for violence.” “With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people,” Miller vowed in the Oval Office. “I don’t care how — it could be a RICO charge, a conspiracy charge, conspiracy against the United States, insurrection — but we are going to do what it takes to dismantle the organizations and the entities,” he added. The average American realizes that this sort of language is dangerous. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted after Kirk’s murder found that most Americans are worried about political violence and partisan divisions: 63% said the way Americans talk about political issues does "a lot" to encourage violence. 79% said people are less tolerant of opposing viewpoints than they were 20 years ago. 66% said they were concerned over the prospect of violence committed against people in their community because of their political beliefs. 71% said that “American society is broken.” Read the right-wingers’ letter and judge it for yourself:
By CSES Staff September 17, 2025
Following a jury trial in Somerset County Circuit Court, Princess Anne Town Commissioner Lionel Frederick was convicted on Sept. 10 of unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition. A former Town Commission president, Frederick was indicted last April in connection with an October 2024 incident in which investigators alleged he had a shotgun in his home. Because of a 2019 conviction for second-degree assault, considered a crime of violence, Frederick was banned from owning or possessing firearms under Maryland law. During Wednesday’s trial, Frederick — as the sole defense witness — testified he did not realize his earlier conviction barred him from keeping the shotgun. He said the weapon had been purchased legally more than 10 years ago and that he had never been told to surrender it. Prosecutors countered that the restriction was clear. The county State’s Attorney’s office produced a probation order from 2019 that prohibited Frederick from having a gun without court authorization. Frederick questioned the authenticity of his signature on the document, going so far as to suggest, “It’s Somerset County. I wouldn’t put it past this court.” After the three-hour trial, jurors deliberated for 30 minutes before finding Frederick guilty on both counts, one a felony for illegal firearm possession and the other a misdemeanor for possessing ammunition unlawfully. Frederick’s sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 2 before Judge Leah Seaton.
By CSES Staff September 17, 2025
Salisbury Mayor Randy Taylor’s administration has suffered another setback in court after the city failed in its attempt to block developer Mentis from privatizing the downtown parking lot known as Lot 10. In February 2023, the city sold Lot 10 to Mentis with the understanding that the property would remain a municipal lot until the developer was ready to begin construction of its hotel and conference center. This summer, Mentis announced its intent to convert Lot 10 to a private lot and to collect its own parking revenue. Taylor’s administration responded on Aug. 19 by filing for a temporary restraining order and injunction, claiming Mentis had breached its agreement by attempting to take control of the lot without obtaining the necessary permits. The city argued that public access should remain until redevelopment officially began. On Sept. 12, Wicomico Co. Circuit Court Judge Leah Seaton rejected the city’s request, ruling that Salisbury had failed to prove “irreparable harm,” a necessary condition for an injunction. The ruling means that Mentis is now free to collect parking fees from Lot 10, while taxpayers are left footing the bill for a failed legal maneuver. Critics say Taylor misplayed the case Residents and downtown stakeholders have accused the Taylor administration of mishandling the dispute and wasting public money. Rather than negotiating directly with Mentis or resolving the funding agreement for the redevelopment project, the mayor opted for an aggressive legal strategy, which ended in defeat. “This administration keeps charging ahead with lawsuits it cannot win,” one downtown business owner said. “Meanwhile, the city burns through taxpayer dollars, and we’re no closer to seeing real progress on the hotel and conference center.” Developer signals willingness to proceed Mentis officials, for their part, said the project can move forward if the city finalizes the sub-recipient agreement needed to release grant funding. “If we can get the city to move forward with the sub-recipient agreement, and that opens up the grant funding flowing to the project, we will continue to move forward with the hotel and conference center,” said Mentis’ Nick Simpson. Taylor points fingers Pushing back, the mayor argued that the developer needs to secure financing, site plans, and construction approvals before the project can advance — materials that have already been provided to the city. But to many observers, the back-and-forth underscores a larger problem: a stalled project that continues to pit City Hall against its private partners, with little to show for years of promises. A hearing on the remaining disputes is scheduled for December, but critics say the damage has been done. The court ruling leaves Mentis in control of Lot 10’s parking revenue and the city with another legal bill, raising questions about whether Salisbury’s mayor is fighting the right battles and how many more tax increases city residents will endure to pay for these legal battles.
By CSES Staff September 17, 2025
Tenants of a dangerous, code-violating, bat-, rat-, roach-, and mold-infested apartment complex in Prince George’s County will collect an $11.2 million settlement against the owners and operators of the complex. Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced the landmark settlement with Heather Hill Apartments after allegations that the property collected rent without a valid license, dodged code inspections, and tried to evict hundreds of tenants. The settlement is the largest restitution ever obtained by the AG’s Consumer Protection Division in a landlord-tenant case. It will provide debt forgiveness, credits, and cash payments to tenants who paid rent while Heather Hill was unlicensed and requires the company to dismiss pending eviction cases tied to that period. “This settlement provides relief for hundreds of Maryland families who were forced to pay rent while some lived in unsafe conditions,” Brown said. “My office will always hold landlords accountable when they put profits over people’s safety.” The company faces three more lawsuits. Broader implications across Maryland While the Heather Hill case is centered in Prince George’s County, housing advocates note that the issues it raises — unlicensed properties, unsafe living conditions, and tenants struggling without recourse — are not confined to one region. On the Eastern Shore, where affordable housing is limited and oversight often inconsistent, tenant advocates have warned of similar problems. Aging multi-family housing in Salisbury, Cambridge, and Crisfield has drawn complaints about weak code enforcement and unsafe conditions. The Heather Hill settlement underscores that the state will step in when landlords fail to comply with licensing laws. For Shore renters, the precedent could mean stronger accountability in local housing markets, which have long marked shortages and rising costs. Connection to statewide reforms The action also comes just days after Gov. Wes Moore signed his Housing Starts Here executive order to accelerate the construction of affordable homes statewide. Together, the order and the Heather Hill settlement reflect a two-pronged strategy: building more housing while holding existing landlords accountable. For Shore communities, where new housing and stronger enforcement are badly needed, the Heather Hill case signals that state officials are paying closer attention to the conditions renters face, not only in the urban core, but across the state.
logo M
By Gren Whitman September 17, 2025
The Maryland Board of Public Works has approved $13 million in grants from the Department of Natural Resources for local governments and land trusts to support community centers, parks, and land conservation projects in 16 counties, including several on the Eastern Shore. In addition to local recreation projects, the board approved $3.2 million in Rural Legacy funding for conservation easements that permanently limit development to protect farms, waterways, and natural habitats. Among the Eastern Shore investments: Talbot County will receive funding for a new softball field at the Home Run Baker Sports Complex. Caroline County is approved to install new playground equipment at Jesse Sutton Memorial Park in Greensboro. Worcester County will receive funds to build new restrooms at Sturgis Park in Snow Hill. The Eastern Shore Land Conservancy will get an award to protect two adjoining properties in Caroline County, covering 220 acres, and safeguarding 7,400 feet of forested stream buffers along tributaries of the Choptank River and preserving scenic views near Preston. In Dorchester County’s Harriet Tubman Rural Legacy Area, the Conservation Fund will secure an easement on a 121-acre farm, preserving historic landscapes along public roads tied to Tubman’s story and protecting valuable agricultural land. “These projects are about building stronger, healthier communities,” Gov. Wes Moore said during the meeting, underscoring the administration’s focus on expanding recreational opportunities and conserving Maryland’s natural resources. The DNR noted that similar projects were approved in counties across Maryland, ranging from new playgrounds and sports facilities to strategic farmland preservation. Officials emphasized that the funding supports immediate community needs and long-term environmental protections. “These grants reflect our dual mission, creating vibrant spaces for Marylanders today while ensuring our land and water resources are protected for generations to come,” DNR Secretary Josh Kurtz said. As a community organizer, journalist, administrator, project planner/manager, and consultant, Gren Whitman has led neighborhood, umbrella, public interest, and political committees and groups, and worked for civil rights and anti-war organizations.
Show More