Blog Post

More Osprey Reproduction Problems Found Around the Chesapeake Bay

Timothy B. Wheeler, Bay Journal • September 3, 2024

Fishery managers debate 'precautionary' menhaden harvest closures


Perched on a nest atop a green navigation marker in Maryland’s Harris Creek, the osprey glared, spread its wings and started hopping as a boatload of people drew near.

 

“That’s a pretty big nestling standing up,” observed Barnett Rattner, a veteran scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey’s Eastern Ecological Science Center. “Last week, there were two.”

 

Peering at the agitated fish hawk through binoculars, Rattner spied the telltale reddish-orange eyes of a juvenile, so the boat halted its approach. They didn’t want to spook the youngster into trying to fly before it was able. It would almost certainly fall in the water and drown — perhaps the fate of its missing nestmate.

 

Rattner and USGS wildlife biologist Dan Day have been visiting osprey nests around Tilghman Island on Maryland’s Eastern Shore every seven to 10 days since early spring. They’re part of a multi-pronged effort to assess the birds’ breeding success around the Chesapeake Bay following a troubling report last year of a drastic reproduction decline in Virginia’s Mobjack Bay.

 

This year, researchers have been monitoring more than 600 breeding pairs of osprey in a dozen locations to see if the problem is happening elsewhere. They have been checking nests in 10 areas along both shores of the Chesapeake where menhaden, a favorite prey of ospreys, usually can be found. They’re also looking in two freshwater locations on Bay rivers where osprey rely on different fish for food.

 

The Chesapeake boasts the world’s largest breeding population of ospreys, estimated at 10,000 to 12,000 pairs. They have staged a remarkable comeback since the 1970s, when contamination from the pesticide DDT, ingested by ospreys from the fish they ate, devastated their ability to produce offspring. The federal government banned DDT in 1972.

 

While toxic chemicals still exist in the environment, the overall population of Bay ospreys continues to grow. But now, scientists are exploring a new potential threat: a lack of fish for ospreys to feed on.

 

Food shortage linked

 

In 2023, scientists with the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William & Mary reported seeing a steep decline in osprey reproduction in Virginia’s Mobjack Bay, which lies between the Rappahannock and York rivers. They linked the breeding woes — even worse than in the DDT era — to a shortage of food, particularly Atlantic menhaden, a migratory fish that is the birds’ dietary staple there.

 



That finding has turned up the heat on a long-running controversy. Recreational anglers and conservationists have complained for years that large commercial harvests of menhaden near the mouth of the Bay in Virginia are harming other fish, especially Atlantic striped bass, which rely upon menhaden for food. That fleet works for Omega Protein, a subsidiary of a Canadian company that processes the menhaden at a plant in Reedville into animal feed and nutritional supplements.

 

The complaint has gone nowhere, in part because data are lacking on how abundant or scarce menhaden are in the Bay. Now, though, the report of nest failures in Mobjack Bay has given advocates fresh ammunition to press for a clampdown on the Chesapeake menhaden harvest. Following an Aug. 6 briefing by USGS scientists about osprey reproduction issues, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, which regulates the menhaden catch along the East Coast, voted to study whether to impose seasonal closures of large-scale harvests of the fish in the Bay.

 

What the USGS scientists have seen so far in mid-Bay Maryland is similar to what the researchers reported in Virginia. Ospreys occupied only a little more than half of the 90 platforms, navigational markers and other available nesting sites where the two USGS scientists saw ospreys in their study area, which stretches from lower Broad Creek into Harris Creek and then around the western side of Tilghman Island.

 

The vast majority of those ospreys that did nest failed to produce or maintain young. By mid-July, there were many more empty nests than those that had even a single chick, much less two or three. Cruising down Harris Creek, Rattner pointed to one loss after another: “That one had eggs in it. It failed. That one never got started.”

 

During his 47-year career with the USGS, Rattner has studied ospreys in several Maryland and Virginia rivers of the Chesapeake, as well as in Delaware Bay. As an ecotoxicologist, he was researching whether pesticides and other toxic chemicals in fish might be affecting the birds’ reproduction or survival. The good news is that, while there are still some areas of concern, contaminants are decreasing and don’t appear to be affecting the overall osprey population in the Bay watershed.

 

But Rattner said the rate of successful breeding he and Day have seen in their Eastern Shore study area this year is far below what he saw 10 to 20 years ago.

 

Multiple reasons for failure

 

“All kinds of things happen to nests,” Rattner pointed out. Crows may feed on eggs if a nest is left unguarded even briefly. Great horned owls and bald eagles snatch chicks. Storms can blow nests off platforms. Diseases take a toll, as does the relentless summer heat. And some osprey pairs — perhaps rookies at breeding — build a nest but don’t produce eggs.

 

On a scorching day in mid-July, female ospreys were perched on some nests, wings outstretched in a few cases to shield the young beneath from the broiling sun. The males usually hunt for fish while the females stay on the nest.

 

To see if food availability might be a factor, Rattner and Day have mounted battery-operated cameras in four nests to monitor the number and type of fish the adults bring back to the nest. In one photo sequence, a male osprey delivered a juvenile striped bass for two chicks to consume.

 

There have been glitches with the cameras, though. The scientists have had to replace batteries and make other adjustments, including shifting at least one camera from a failed nest to one with eggs or chicks.

 

One year’s fieldwork is just a snapshot, of course. Rattner said that more research is needed to identify trends and fill data gaps.

 


And the apparent surge in nest failures does not mean the Chesapeake osprey population is in danger of collapsing — at least not anytime soon, said Bryan Watts, director of the Center for Conservation Biology. Ospreys nesting upriver in the Bay watershed are still producing plenty of offspring, and the overall population continues to grow.

 

“This is a long-lived species,” Watts said. “With lifespans averaging 15 to 20 years, they can withstand a dip in reproduction.”

 

But because ospreys subsist almost exclusively on fish, he said, they are a good indicator of fish abundance. That’s the main reason for the nest surveys, he added.

 

To date, Mobjack Bay is the only place with direct scientific evidence that menhaden — or their apparent scarcity — influenced osprey reproduction. There, scientists conducted a controlled experiment, feeding some newly hatched birds an extra ration of menhaden and comparing their better survival with those subsisting on what could be caught in the wild.

 

Watts suggested that high rates of nest failure seen in the areas where menhaden are usually abundant provide circumstantial evidence that food availability played a role.

 

Sign of food stress

 

“A high proportion of failures after hatching and a larger proportion of one-chick broods is a clear sign of food stress,” he said. For example, along Maryland’s Patuxent River, one of the areas Watts monitored this year, almost 60% of osprey pairs that successfully reproduced had one-chick broods.

 

Greg Kearns, a naturalist with the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission who’s been banding and monitoring ospreys on the Patuxent for 40 years, said he’d seen a significant drop this year in the number of ospreys attempting to nest.

 

And by early July, Kearns said he’d seen a lot of failed nests, particularly along the lower river, where menhaden traditionally make up the bulk of the ospreys’ diet.

 

There was something off about this nesting season almost from the beginning, Watts said. Ospreys returned to the Bay as usual in late February and early March after wintering in South America and the Caribbean. But many didn’t lay eggs in early spring or at all, he said. And many of the eggs laid in late spring either didn’t hatch or the chicks didn’t survive as summer temperatures climbed into the 90s.

 

“I think that the birds were squeezed with low food availability,” he said, “then ran into the heat wave.”

 

There were anecdotal reports that the schools of menhaden that return to the Bay every spring after wintering off the mid-Atlantic coast didn’t show up on time or at all this year. Some have suggested the Bay’s unusually low salinity the first half of the year after a wet winter and spring may have deterred them.

 

Of course, there may also be other factors affecting ospreys’ reproduction. Pete McGowan, a biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said he suspects that nest predation has been a big factor in a near total failure of ospreys to produce young on Poplar Island, which is in the middle of the Bay about a mile west of Tilghman Island in Maryland. Only three nests out of 25 begun in the spring are still active, he said, with just one chick in each.

 

Poplar Island is not one of the 12 sites Watts and colleagues have been monitoring, but Watts suggested that at least some of those nest failures could still be an indirect result of food stress. If the male osprey doesn’t bring enough fish, the female may leave the nest unguarded to search herself, leaving it open to predators.

 

Fishery study delayed

 

So far, fisheries managers are not convinced that there’s a problem with menhaden. A 2022 stock assessment concluded that the coastwide population of the forage fish is not being overharvested. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, which oversees near-shore fisheries from Maine to Florida, has for several years maintained a cap on the commercial harvest of menhaden in the Chesapeake. Conservationists and angler groups, however, contend that the cap is too loose and that the Virginia-based fishing fleet is depleting the stock there.

 


There’s been no study, though, to settle that dispute. Virginia lawmakers agreed in 2023 to draw up plans for a study, but this year they decided to wait until 2025 to decide whether to conduct the research. Meanwhile, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission has rejected petitions calling for a moratorium in Bay waters of the type of purse-seine harvesting performed by Omega’s fleet. Angler groups have gone to court seeking to force a cutback.

 

At the Aug. 6 meeting of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Lynn Fegley, fisheries director for Maryland's Department of Natural Resources, urged the body to adopt seasonal closures of large-scale menhaden harvests in the Chesapeake as a precaution to ensure that osprey and other fish-eating birds and fish have enough to sustain themselves. She said the state's commercial watermen are also suffering because menhaden are the preferred bait for harvesting blue crabs, the state's most lucrative fishery.

 

Other commission members countered that there are a number of factors affecting osprey reproduction, including competition for food from other birds and fish. They also noted that warming waters from climate change may be prompting some fish populations to shift farther north and away from the Bay. Pat Geer, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission's fisheries chief, argued that without more scientific evidence, it would be inappropriate to single out the state's Omega fleet for seasonal harvest closures.

 

The commission staff is in the process of updating "ecological reference points" it had adopted in 2020 to ensure there are enough menhaden left unharvested to sustain fish-eating birds and other fish.

 

Fegley's motion, which would have set the commission on a course to impose seasonal closures, failed. Then Allison Colden, Maryland director of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and a commission member, proposed instead that a work group be formed to evaluate options for "precautionary" management of menhaden in the Bay, including possibly seasonal closures. It passed unanimously. The group is to make at least a preliminary report at the commission's next meeting in October. 

 

 

This article was originally published in the Bay Journal, a non-profit news source that provides the public with independent reporting on environmental news and issues in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

 

Vote 2024. Image: CSES design
By Peter Heck November 19, 2024
It’s probably too early for a real analysis of why the Harris/Walz ticket was defeated in this year’s presidential election, although there are plenty of people taking a crack at it. For a couple of interesting examples, take a look at Heather Cox Richardson’s Nov. 6 column , or David Brooks in the New York Times. Important factors certainly included sexism and racism. Many Americans still aren’t ready to accept a woman leader — especially a Black woman. And I spoke to one local person who said that many Black men he knew were wary of voting for Harris because she had been a prosecutor, putting other Black men and minorities behind bars. Whether or not that was a factor, Harris’s share of the Black vote was some 10% lower than Biden’s. But the most significant factor was probably voter turnout. According to a Nov. 11 New York Times story , Democratic turnout was significantly lower than in 2020. This helped produce a narrow majority in the popular vote for the Republican ticket. Trump’s total nationwide was about 74 million votes, roughly the same as he received in 2020. Harris, on the other hand, was at 70 million — roughly 11 million less than President Biden’s 2020 total. If those voters had come out again and voted mostly Democratic, Harris would have some 81 million votes to Trump’s 74 million, giving her the popular vote. Depending on where the voters lived, that could have produced a very different result in the Electoral College and the election itself. Though the Electoral College totals imply otherwise, this was really a close election. Incidentally, a reaction against incumbents may be another significant factor, and a global rather than a U.S. phenomenon. An article in the Financial Times notes that every incumbent party — on both ends of the political spectrum — in developed countries lost significant vote share in an election this year — an astonishing turn of events. Here on the Eastern Shore, nobody should be surprised that the majority of the voting public went for the Republicans. The area, after all, is predominantly rural and conservative, with a few blue enclaves such as Easton and Chestertown. While town-by-town results on the Shore are not yet available, in Talbot County, in which Easton is the largest town, Trump won by some 500 votes. Queen Anne’s gave Trump the win by about 9,000 votes. Local elections were not on the ballot in 2024, but local officials on the Shore — mayors, sheriffs, state’s attorneys, county commissioners, delegates to the General Assembly, etc. — largely reflect that Republican dominance. And day-to-day life is more directly affected by these people in all communities than by anyone in Washington. Still, what happens on the national level will have its effect on all of us. The architects and supporters of Project 2025 are going to be part of the new Trump administration, and he has appointed some of the project’s supporters already. Those appointees are probably going to be quite adamant in pushing through their agenda. Even if they can’t accomplish everything, some of the proposed plans ought to be cause for concern, above all the weakening of women’s rights, especially reproductive freedom. And with the Senate, possibly the House, and the Supreme Court effectively on the same page as the administration, the constitutional checks and balances will be severely weakened. If, as he said he would, Trump imposes heavy tariffs on imports, almost every economist predicts that consumer prices will rise, thus making it harder to control inflation. If a mass deportation of immigrants gets underway, many jobs will go unfilled, particularly in construction and food service. This will further hurt the economy. It’s possible that pressure to fill those jobs could raise wages. If RFK Jr. brings his anti-vaccine beliefs to the health department, another pandemic — a new covid strain, or just the regular flu — could kill millions. If Elon Musk starts cutting back what he perceives as governmental waste, programs benefitting local communities are likely to suffer, again removing dollars from local and state economies. The foreign policy implications of some of Trump’s statements could be significant. He has threatened to pull the U.S. out of NATO. This may be unlikely, but that political stance may encourage current and would-be aggressors in Europe and the Middle East. And Trump has said he will end the war in Ukraine in one day. Does he really have that much influence on Putin? Or does Putin have that much influence on Trump? Time will tell. Looking down the road, one also has to consider Trump’s health. Born in June 1946, he will be 82 by the end of his term. What if he becomes incapacitated, physically or mentally? A stroke, a heart attack, or just the rigors of old age in a stressful office — all are possible. Would Vice President-elect Vance, a former venture capitalist in the technology sector, continue Trump’s policies, or would he have ideas of his own? At one time, Vance criticized many of Trump’s positions. If Trump is no longer in charge, could there be a period of infighting as various factions within the party and administration assert their own priorities? Any of that could have significant effects, and it’s not unlikely, given Trump’s age. So it looks as if we are about to live in “interesting times.” Some people are talking about leaving the country, while others are still trying to understand what just happened. Many are already looking forward and starting to concentrate on the 2026 midterms, when Republicans could consolidate their gains or Democrats could make a comeback. May we all get through these times to the point where we can tell a younger generation the kinds of stories our elders told us about the Great Depression or the Civil Rights movement — hopefully, with something resembling a happy ending. Peter Heck is a Chestertown-based writer and editor, who spent 10 years at the Kent County News and three more with the Chestertown Spy. He is the author of 10 novels and co-author of four plays, a book reviewer for Asimov’s and Kirkus Reviews, and an incorrigible guitarist. 
No mandate. Image: CSES design.
By Jan Plotczyk November 19, 2024
 The 2024 presidential election was over swiftly. The Associated Press called it at 5:34 am on Nov. 6, and by 8 am, President-elect Donald Trump was crowing about the “ historic mandate ” given to him by the American people. A “mandate”? Turns out not. Trump jumped to an early lead on election night, but in the following days, his lead diminished as mail-in and provisional ballots were counted. A Baltimore Banner article on Nov. 6 highlighted the “Trump shift” that had occurred in every political subdivision in Maryland, even in counties where Democrat Kamala Harris won. This shift described the increase in Trump support since his loss to President Joe Biden in 2020 . As of Nov. 6, the biggest Trump shift was an 8.1% increase in his support in red Cecil County, but there were also shifts in the central Maryland counties that are the state’s Democratic strongholds — 4.3% in Montgomery and lesser amounts in other blue counties. Fourteen counties recorded shifts of 4% or more. On the Eastern Shore, every county had a shift over 4.5% except Talbot (2.7%), and the five largest shifts were Shore counties. For the state’s Democrats, it did not look encouraging. But as mail-in and provisional ballots were counted across the state, the Trump shift was reduced everywhere, and as of Nov. 16, disappeared altogether in Garrett (-1.2%) and Charles (-0.1%) counties. The shift dropped below 3% in all Maryland counties. Cecil’s shift became 2.1%. Montgomery’s shift dropped to 2.9%. Talbot’s shift declined to 0.2%, lowest of the Eastern Shore counties. Now, instead of five, only two of the highest five shifts were in Eastern Shore counties. The red bars in the chart below represent the Trump shift percentage values as of Nov. 16, in ascending order. The grey bars represent the misleading (and ephemeral) Trump shift percentage values as of Nov. 6. Please note the degree to which the Trump shift lessened and disappeared in the 10 days after the election. Another red mirage. But if you had only read the Nov. 6 article and not looked at the updated data, you would have been fooled into thinking Trump support is stronger than it is.
School board elections. Image: CSES design
By Jim Block November 19, 2024
How many times were Common Sense readers told that the 2024 election would be the most important ever? Whoever the winner, people knew the results would not unite the country but further divide it. One place of divisive conflict on the Eastern Shore, indeed almost everywhere, is the local school system. Two extreme right-wing organizations targeting school board control have made their presence known on the Eastern Shore. Moms for Liberty , according to its website , wants “to empower parents to defend parental rights at all levels of government.” In the recent election, Moms for Liberty endorsed at least two Cecil Co. Board of Education candidates. One of them, Sam J. Davis (who got 44% of the total vote ), lost his race to Diane Racine Heath (55%). Another Moms for Liberty candidate, Tierney Farlan Davis, Sr. (57%), defeated Dita Watson (42%). Both defeated candidates were endorsed by the Cecil County Classroom Teachers Association . A second active conservative organization is the 1776 Project PAC . This PAC’s mission statement declares that it “is committed to reigniting the spark and spirit of that revolution by reforming school boards across America. Since progressive-led efforts to lockdown schools during the covid epidemic, test scores have declined, parents and students are increasingly worried about violence both in and out of the classroom, while politicians and activists push their own ideology.” Of the eight Eastern Shore school board candidates the 1776 PAC supported, three were unopposed. The five competitive races were won by 1776 PAC candidates; the average margin of victory was about 12%. The Talbot Co. candidate Ann O’Connor wrote a piece for the Delmarva Times and the Easton Gazette denying that her candidacy had received “endorsements from Moms for Liberty or any other group.” On the other hand, on X , we read that the 1776 PAC gave “huge congratulations to Ann O’Connor . . . for being elected to the now-conservative Talbot County Board of Education!” One might wonder whether or not any group gave her an endorsement. In a late October, the Washington Post ran a long story about the significant partisan cash flowing into Maryland school board races. In theory, Maryland school board elections are nonpartisan, because state law prohibits party labels on school board ballots. On the other hand, according to the Post, the 1776 PAC “has spent a total of $75,409.58 on 13 Maryland school board candidates across Cecil, Queen Anne’s, Talbot, Calvert, Somerset and St. Mary’s counties.” That sum and the other money spent on school board candidates does not indicate the strength of passion in the candidates and their supporters. Our governments are obligated to allow, if not to support, all citizens in their exercise of their First Amendment rights. Assuming freedom of speech applies to students and teachers , the last thing public school administrations should do is wrongly to restrict material that teachers teach and students learn. But when students learn that school systems inappropriately control what is taught, they will be at best confused. On one hand, they are taught they have free speech; on the other hand, they learn that in school, they don’t. Have we just been through American history’s most important election? If these school board elections diminish our Constitutional rights, the sad answer is yes. Jim Block taught English at Northfield Mount Hermon, a boarding school in Western Mass. He coached cross-country and advised the newspaper and the debate society there. He taught at Marlborough College in England and Robert College in Istanbul. He and his wife retired to Chestertown, Md., in 2014. 
Woman in gynecologist’s office. Image: CSES design
By Jeanette E. Sherbondy November 19, 2024
Although the election of Trump as president represents an open threat to maternal health according to the statements in Project 2025, there were some wins for women’s health at the voting booths. One major win for Maryland is the election of Angela Alsobrooks to the Senate. She has stated her position explicitly . She promised to co-sponsor the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would reinstate a nationwide right to abortion care by codifying Roe v. Wade . Even more strongly, she declares she will oppose any judicial nominee who does not support abortion rights. She firmly believes Congress and the Supreme Court should respect women’s health care decisions and leave them to be made between women and their doctors. Maryland also is a winner for passing a ballot measure to add the right to abortion into the state constitution. Six other states did the same: Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Montana, New York, and Nevada. The National Law Review stated, “In Colorado, Maryland, New York, and Nevada, abortion was already protected under state law, so the ballot measures did not change what employers and health insurers will need to do to comply with the law. However, the ballot measures enshrined the right to abortion in those state constitutions, so it will be harder for future lawmakers to revoke these protections in the future.” Similar ballot measures failed in three states: Florida, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Maryland’s measure states that every person “has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, including but not limited to the ability to make and effectuate decisions to prevent, continue, or end one’s pregnancy. The state may not, directly or indirectly, deny, burden, or abridge the right unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means.” Ironically, Amanda Marcotte in Salon noted that “In state after state, voters backed both Trump and ballot initiatives that advanced and protected progressive goals.” Fortunately, many organizations have reaffirmed their intention to continue to fight for women’s health. Moms Rising , for example, affirms its dedication to maternal health: “Focusing on equity in pregnancy, childbirth, and the period after childbirth, our organizing is built on understanding and lived experience of greater systemic issues mothers experience throughout motherhood due to race, class, and gender disparities. This work includes campaigns on maternal mortality/morbidity, as well as mass incarceration and police reform.” According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , the maternal mortality rate in the United States is 32.9 deaths per 100,000 live births. In 2021, 1,205 women died of maternal causes compared to 861 in 2020 and 754 in 2019. That does not include all deaths occurring to pregnant or recently pregnant women. According to the American Medical Association, this spike in maternal deaths is the highest since 1965. The reasons are many. Dr. Sandra Fryhofer stated that “Black women are three times likelier than White women to die from a pregnancy-related cause. Health care access problems, underlying chronic conditions, and structural racism and implicit bias all contribute to these bleak statistics. “Poor insurance coverage prior to, during, and after pregnancy; lack of interprofessional teams trained in best practices; and closure of maternity units in many rural and urban communities” are other factors that contribute to bad maternal outcomes according to the AMA. It recommends expanding access to medical and mental health care and social services for postpartum women. The Commonwealth Fund wrote, “The United States continues to have the highest rate of maternal deaths of any high-income nation, despite a decline since the covid-19 pandemic. And within the U.S., the rate is by far the highest for Black women. Most of these deaths — over 80% — are likely preventable.” In her recent book, Eve (2023), Cat Bohannon explores women’s health within the largest framework possible — the last 200 million years of human evolution. She explains that humans have relied on gynecological aid for millennia because giving birth is very risky. However, when well supported and cared for, women can give birth successfully to the future generations, that is, as long as they have special care before, during, and after birth. According to the Commonwealth Fund , “Nearly two of three maternal deaths in the U.S. occur during the postpartum period, up to 42 days following birth. Compared to women in the other countries we studied, U.S. women are the least likely to have supports such as home visits and guaranteed paid leave during this critical time. The U.S. and Canada have the lowest supply of midwives and ob-gyns.” Given that mothers shape the health and growth of new generations, a society needs to put special emphasis into promoting the health and education and social well-being of infants and children by their moms. That means supporting women. Countries that do this benefit economically on the national scale and those that don’t fall behind. Racism and misogyny embedded in cultural practices, such as giving preference to males in detriment to females, to White people instead of to Black and Brown people, have long reaching deleterious effects. Egalitarianism has always been a human tendency that improves the chances of human survival. Jeanette E. Sherbondy is a retired anthropology professor from Washington College and has lived here since 1986. In retirement she has been active with the Kent County Historical Society and Sumner Hall, one of the organizers of Legacy Day, and helped get highway /historical markers recognizing Henry Highland Garnet. She published an article on her ethnohistorical research of the free Black village, Morgnec.
Graphic from the Salisbury Comprehensive Plan Report, Nov 2023. Image: Salisbury website
By Jared Schablein November 19, 2024
There is an urgent issue in Salisbury requiring immediate engagement. Mayor Randy Taylor's administration is trying to hide from our community that they intend to internally and unilaterally rewrite our 10-year Comprehensive Plan, without the knowledge of the Salisbury City Council. We need to encourage Mayor Randy Taylor and the City Administration that our council and our community deserve to be a part of this vital process. Last week public comments were collected at the City Headquarters Building. Residents submitted written comments and could share a three-minute comment addressing why this plan to subvert the Comprehensive Plan approval process is concerning to them. You can still help! Share this Email . We need to show the City that our residents are ready to take action! Please consider sending an email with this form to directly express your concerns to the Mayor's Office. Jared Schablein is the chair of Shore Progress.
Native American beadwork
By Lisa Michelle King November 19, 2024
Too often, K-12 social studies classes in the U.S. teach a mostly glossed-over story of U.S. settlement. Textbooks tell the stories of adventurous European explorers founding colonies in the “New World,” and stories of the “first Thanksgiving” frequently portray happy colonists and Native Americans feasting together.
Show More
Share by: