What a Difference a Rule Makes! Voting Rules, House & Senate, Part 1

Jane Jewell • February 21, 2019

This is the first in a series of occasional mini civics lessons wherein we look at how our American-style democracy works—or doesn’t. This time, a glimpse behind the scenes into how that “legislative sausage” is made.

Jan. 3, 2019, was a special day in Washington DC. It marked the first day of a brand-new congress—the 116th US Congress. Each congress—they’re all numbered—begins at noon on Jan 3 of odd-numbered years and lasts for two years. The 116th Congress will consist of two one-year “sessions,” the first runs through Jan. 2, 2020, and the second through Jan. 2, 2021.

The first order of business for each new congress is to set and vote on the rules for their two-year term. Usually the rules are carried over from the previous congresses—with perhaps a few tweaks here and there. Mostly those tweaks are minor, though even a small rule change can sometimes make a dramatic difference in the way Congress works. Each of the two chambers of congress—the US House of Representatives and the US Senate—makes their own rules. And although they are similar, there are a few major differences.

One such difference that has already had a huge impact in 2019 concerns the way bills are brought to the floor of either chamber for debate followed by a final vote on passage.

Both the House and the Senate have procedures to request or require an end of debate and to go directly to a final vote on a bill. This can be routine or requested when there is any delay or political stalling in placing a vote on the agenda. In the House, it is a fairly simple, straightforward procedure. It’s basically the same as in Robert’s Rules of Order which is the standard guide book used by most boards, companies, clubs, and other organizations.

In the House, if there is a delay in scheduling a vote, any member can call the “previous question” or “previous motion,” and then a vote to end debate must be held. If it passes with a simple majority, then discussion on the issue is officially over and the final vote is taken either soon or immediately after. The bill either passes and becomes law or it doesn’t. Though a lot of politicking and pressure goes on, at least this way no one person can indefinitely prevent a measure from being debated and voted on.

However, it is very different in the Senate. There is no easy way in that chamber to force or guarantee that a final vote will ever be held—whether that vote is for a bill, a nomination, a treaty, or a resolution.

In theory, and often in practice, Senate votes are scheduled as a matter of routine after a bill or other matter is voted favorably out of its assigned committee. However, the Senate, unlike the House, is basically structured on a consensus model, meaning everything must be decided unanimously. This effectively gives every senator an absolute veto on everything. Thus a tradition and practice of cooperation, collaboration, and trust is needed to get anything done. But what trust and collaboration there has been in the past has been steadily eroding in recent decades.

For example, in recent years, under multiple administrations, many nominations have not been voted on for months or even years because one senator “put a hold” on the vote, using the senatorial veto and preventing the other senators from exercising their votes. Likewise, chairs of committees and majority leaders of both parties have refused to put controversial measures—or just ones they didn’t personally like or were afraid might pass—onto the agenda so that they could be brought to the Senate floor and discussion could begin.

While consensus or unanimous consent is a laudable goal—in fact it’s a very attractive idea—in practice it can cause the wheels to grind to a halt and make it almost impossible to hold any votes or make any decisions at all.

The best known recent example of this “any-senator-can-veto-anything” situation is Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who last December refused to allow the Senate to vote on a Budget bill to prevent the government shutdown—a bill that had already been passed by the House. That shutdown cost the US billions of dollars, much emotional stress, and was so unpopular within both parties and among the general population that the next Budget bill—one that was almost the same as the first—passed easily. Now that first version might not have passed, though it was expected to pass if it ever came to a vote. But we’ll never know because one senator prevented that vote. This is not an evaluation of that one senator for being obstructive, but an analysis of a system that allows, even encourages, such results.

In Part 2, we will look into the various methods that our politicians and representatives use to grease—or throw a monkey wrench into—the wheels in the Senate. Next time, the infamous filibuster and the byzantine cloture process along with the less familiar but frequently-used UCA (Unanimous Consent Agreement).


Links for some sources for this article and for more information on the subject:

“Where, When, and Why Does the US Congress Meet? Keeping the Nation's Legislative Business on Schedule”: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-are-congressional-sessions-3322284

“What Senate Cloture Votes Tell US About Obstructionism”: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2013/11/12/what-senate-cloture-votes-tell-us-about-obstruction/?utm_term=.a113f6602d65

“Worksheet: The Legislative Branch”: https://docplayer.net/23965410-Worksheet-the-legislative-branch.htm l


Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Show More