My Short, Happy Time with Eleanor Roosevelt and Other Adventures in 1960

Sherwin Markman • April 27, 2021

“I detest his father,” Eleanor Roosevelt blurted out, shocking me by the unbridled emotion suddenly revealed by this elegant woman. “I am certain he will be controlled and corrupted by that awful man.” She was referring to Joseph Kennedy and his son, John Kennedy.

It was July 1960 and she was seated on the sofa in my hotel room. I was sitting on the floor, literally at her feet. We were alone, except for a young aide of hers. We were in Los Angeles at the time of the Democratic National Convention and we were watching a televised debate between John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. Kennedy’s nomination was being hotly contested not only by Johnson, but by a host of other candidates, including Adlai Stevenson, who was supported by Mrs. Roosevelt. I was then serving on Stevenson’s campaign staff.


As it happened, there was a somewhat unique aspect to my involvement with Stevenson. The previous May, I was invited to meet privately with John Kennedy in his hotel room. He was campaigning in Des Moines, my hometown. In 1956, I had headed the Iowa effort in Stevenson’s losing presidential bid against Dwight Eisenhower. Now in 1960, Stevenson was running for president for a third time, and, despite the fact that his campaign was showing no particular signs of life, I had once again agreed to lead in Iowa.

 

And so it was that Kennedy invited me to his room. There, he began effusively over-complimenting me. After a few minutes of that, he proceeded to offer me a position on his staff. After thanking him for the offer, I declined.

 

Kennedy was puzzled by my quick refusal. “Don’t you want to think about it?” he asked. “Several of your fellow Stevenson people have already come over to me.”

 

“Yes, I know that,” I stated. “They can do whatever they wish. As for me, I’ve made my commitment to Stevenson and I don’t think I want to break it.”

 

“Don’t you know that Stevenson doesn’t have a chance?” Kennedy asked. “I might not win, but he sure as hell won’t. How can you possibly disagree with that?”

 

“I can’t,” I admitted.

 

“Then you’re a damn fool and you really have no business being in politics,” Kennedy stated, not unkindly.

 

I couldn’t disagree with that either.

 

Nonetheless, I persisted in my efforts on behalf of Stevenson, and here I was at the July nominating convention. As it turned out, those efforts only managed to prove the accuracy of Kennedy’s observation concerning my lack of political acumen.

 

Consequently, despite all practical indications of the hopelessness of the cause, I found myself personally leading a very public last ditch effort to block Kennedy’s nomination.

 

The thinking behind this effort was that if Kennedy did not win on the first ballot, he would lose on subsequent ballots.

 

A significant number of Kennedy first-ballot votes would come from the release to Kennedy of so-called “favorite son” first-ballot votes, i.e., states where the delegates had been instructed by their nominating conventions to cast their votes for one of that state’s leaders.

 

That was the case with Iowa Gov. Herschel Loveless. The plan was to get the convention chairman to rule that “favorite son” pledged delegates must vote as pledged on the first ballot, thus denying Kennedy a first-ballot victory. And, because Loveless precisely fit into this mold, I, as a delegate from Iowa, was directed to lead the fight. Unfortunately for me, Loveless thought he had been promised the vice president nomination by Kennedy, and therefore any effort to block his withdrawal as a “favorite son” was anathema to Kennedy and, of course, to Loveless.

 

I was left with no doubt about Loveless’s feelings when, in a convention corridor with the press all around us, he stopped me to growl, “I’m going to destroy you, you no good son of a bitch.”

 

At the time, I believed this was my political death knell. The fact that a little over five years later I found myself serving in the White House as one of Lyndon Johnson’s assistants is a story for another day.

 

But at that time, and taking actions that I then thought clearly demonstrated the wisdom of Kennedy’s observation about my future, I fought on to the last. In the end, I found myself in a small office at the back of the convention dais, desperately and unsuccessfully arguing my case to Florida’s Gov. Leroy Collins, the convention chairman, with the assistance of Sen. Eugene McCarthy, who remained with me right up to the moment he walked out to give the nominating speech for Stevenson.

 

Then it was over. Kennedy was nominated on the first ballot and Stevenson, Johnson (for the moment), and all the others, were losers.

 

But none of that, in my memory, overrides the pleasure I received during that July day I spent with Eleanor Roosevelt.

 

It had come about because Mrs. Roosevelt, in her fervent wish to do everything she could to help Stevenson win the nomination, had offered to spend a day personally meeting with as many state delegations as possible. The Stevenson campaign was grateful and, for reasons never told to me, directed me to escort her. It was an experience I have never forgotten. Despite her age — then 76 — she was vigorous, full of energy, charm, and wisdom, and exhausting to keep up with. I thought she was effective but in reality, she probably did not change many votes.

 

In the middle of our journey through the state delegations, we received word that Kennedy and Johnson were about to have a televised debate before the Texas delegation. Mrs. Roosevelt turned me and said that she very much wanted to watch. “I want to watch privately,” she emphasized. But where? That would not be easy for a woman as universally recognized as Eleanor Roosevelt.

 

At that moment, we were visiting a delegation in a hotel ballroom which happened to be the hotel where I had a room — a small room at that. But it had a television. Gingerly, I suggested going there, and, without hesitation, she said, “Let’s go.”

 

And so we went.

 

After the debate concluded, I escorted Mrs. Roosevelt to the hotel entrance where her car was waiting. She thanked me and said goodbye.

 

Then she shook my hand. She had the softest, warmest hand I have ever touched.

 

 

Sherwin Markman, a graduate of the Yale Law School, lives with his wife, Kathryn (Peggy) in Rock Hall, Maryland. He served as an assistant to President Lyndon Johnson, after which was a trial lawyer in Washington, D.C. He has published several books, including one dealing with the Electoral College. He has also taught and lectured about the American political system.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More